Homework (1982), directed by James Beshears and starring Joan Collins, Richard Mulligan, and Jane Seymour, is a film that straddles the line between earnest teen drama and unintentional comedy, creating a unique “awesome terrible” viewing experience. From the opening scenes, it’s clear that Homework is not content to play it safe. It dives headfirst into adolescent angst, sexual tension, and melodrama with a boldness that feels both earnest and hilariously overblown. It is a film that entertains not just despite its flaws, but because of them, delivering a viewing experience that is as awkward and exaggerated as it is strangely compelling.
The story centers on Brad, a high school student struggling to navigate the turbulent waters of teenage life, parental expectations, and burgeoning sexual awareness. Played by Richard Mulligan’s occasionally over-the-top paternal authority figure, the adult characters’ exaggerated concern for Brad’s behavior sets the stage for a narrative that vacillates between sincere drama and comedic absurdity. The tension between teenage rebellion and adult oversight is heightened to cartoonish levels, creating situations that are simultaneously cringe-worthy and engaging.
Joan Collins, in a rare early ’80s role, brings her trademark charisma to the film as one of the adults in Brad’s orbit. Collins’ presence is both glamorous and slightly intimidating, offering a contrast to the naive and often bumbling teenagers around her. Her performance, while serious in intent, often comes across as unintentionally theatrical in the heightened context of the film, adding to its “awesome terrible” charm. Collins’ overemphasis in dramatic moments, combined with the often stilted dialogue, creates a comedic tension that underscores the absurdity of the situations she navigates.
Jane Seymour plays another adult figure in the film, offering a blend of maternal warmth and narrative convenience. Seymour’s performance is competent and earnest, but in a film where teenage angst is exaggerated to absurdity, her seriousness often amplifies the humor rather than grounding the story. The contrast between the adult characters’ melodramatic concern and the teenagers’ exaggerated emotional turmoil creates a tension that defines the film’s unique tone.
The teen characters themselves are a blend of earnest performances and over-the-top writing. The awkwardness of first love, sexual curiosity, and peer pressure are all amplified, often resulting in moments that feel exaggerated, unrealistic, and unintentionally funny. The film’s approach to adolescent sexual tension is particularly audacious for its time, mixing earnestness with cringe-worthy awkwardness. Scenes of romantic miscommunication, misunderstandings, and awkward encounters pile absurdity upon absurdity, creating a narrative that is both ridiculous and compelling.
Director James Beshears approaches the material with a seriousness that unintentionally amplifies the film’s humor. The cinematography captures the suburban high school environment with a heightened sense of importance, giving ordinary settings—bedrooms, hallways, classrooms—a melodramatic gravitas that clashes with the absurdity of the teen antics. This tonal dissonance is central to the film’s charm: it is a movie that takes itself seriously while presenting scenarios that are laughably exaggerated.
The film’s pacing is a mix of rapid-fire comedic beats and slow, dramatic stretches. While the story meanders at times, it maintains a sense of engagement through the unpredictability of the teenagers’ emotional reactions and the escalating tension of romantic misadventures. Scenes of parental interference, social misunderstandings, and awkward encounters build on each other, culminating in sequences that are as entertaining in their absurdity as they are melodramatic. The narrative never allows the audience a moment of true calm, keeping viewers on edge in a uniquely awkward way.
Humor in Homework arises largely from exaggeration and juxtaposition. The earnestness of the adult performances, combined with the teenage characters’ over-the-top emotional responses, creates moments of unintentional comedy. Dialogue is often stilted and melodramatic, giving the impression that each character believes they are delivering Shakespearean-level insight into adolescent life. The resulting tension between intent and execution is central to the film’s appeal, making it endlessly watchable for fans of movies that are so earnest they become ridiculous.
One of the film’s most memorable aspects is its handling of teenage sexual awakening. Scenes involving flirtation, miscommunication, and awkward encounters are played with maximum seriousness, heightening the comedic effect when viewed through a modern lens. The film is unabashedly focused on adolescent desire, navigating topics that range from innocent curiosity to more provocative situations. These moments, while intended to be serious, often land as awkward or unintentionally hilarious, reinforcing the movie’s status as an “awesome terrible” gem.
Supporting characters add additional layers of absurdity and entertainment. Brad’s classmates, friends, and romantic interests all display exaggerated traits, from over-the-top shyness to ridiculous bravado. These characters contribute to misunderstandings, social faux pas, and chaotic sequences that escalate the central tension. Their interactions are both entertaining and absurd, creating a dynamic that oscillates between genuine teen drama and laugh-out-loud comedy. The supporting cast’s commitment to their roles, regardless of how improbable or exaggerated the scenarios, amplifies the film’s chaotic charm.
Visually, Homework captures a heightened version of suburban life. Classrooms, homes, and public spaces are all presented with a sense of importance and drama, making ordinary teenage experiences feel monumental. Costume and set design reflect the era and contribute to character development, exaggerating personalities and social roles. The film’s attention to visual detail, while earnest, often contrasts hilariously with the absurdity of the plot, adding to its charm as an “awesome terrible” movie.
The soundtrack and musical cues further emphasize the melodrama. From swelling emotional scores to awkwardly timed musical transitions, the audio design underscores both dramatic and comedic beats. Music is used to heighten tension, punctuate awkward encounters, and emphasize moments of heightened teenage angst. These choices, while sometimes heavy-handed, contribute to the film’s unique tonal balance of seriousness and absurdity.
While Homework is undeniably flawed—its dialogue is occasionally stilted, the plot meanders, and character motivations are sometimes unclear—these imperfections are inseparable from its charm. The film’s earnestness, combined with its exaggerated approach to teen life and melodrama, creates a viewing experience that is both ridiculous and entertaining. Its flaws are not distractions; they are central to why the movie remains memorable and enjoyable in its own chaotic way.
Thematically, the film explores adolescence, parental pressure, sexual curiosity, and the struggle for identity. While these themes are presented through a lens of melodrama and exaggeration, they are relatable to anyone who remembers the chaos of high school life. The film’s exaggerated scenarios and heightened performances serve as a comedic mirror, reflecting the intensity and awkwardness of adolescence in a way that is both entertaining and strangely cathartic.
Physical comedy and awkward situations are central to the film’s entertainment. From misunderstandings in the classroom to chaotic interactions with authority figures, the movie embraces absurdity with gusto. The teenage characters’ exaggerated reactions, combined with the adults’ melodramatic seriousness, create moments of comedy that are as awkward as they are entertaining. These sequences reinforce the film’s identity as an “awesome terrible” movie: flawed, chaotic, and irresistibly watchable.
Ultimately, Homework is a film of contradictions. It is melodramatic yet unintentionally funny, awkward yet strangely relatable, chaotic yet structured enough to maintain narrative coherence. Its strength lies in its audacity and commitment to portraying teenage life with maximum intensity. Joan Collins, Jane Seymour, and Richard Mulligan anchor the film with charisma and energy, while the teenage cast navigates the absurdity of adolescence with earnestness and occasional comedic brilliance. The film’s tonal inconsistencies, stilted dialogue, and melodramatic performances are inseparable from its appeal, making it a memorable example of “awesome terrible” cinema.
The enduring charm of Homework comes from its boldness, energy, and willingness to embrace the awkward chaos of adolescence. It is a movie that entertains precisely because it refuses to be subtle or conventional, delivering an experience that is both ridiculous and strangely compelling. The combination of over-the-top performances, melodramatic scenarios, and awkward humor ensures that the film remains a standout entry in early ’80s teen cinema.
For viewers willing to embrace awkwardness, chaos, and melodramatic teen antics, Homework delivers a viewing experience that is both hilariously absurd and oddly engaging. It is a film that makes audiences cringe, laugh, and marvel at the audacity of its storytelling—an unforgettable example of cinema that is so earnest, it becomes ridiculous.
This post has already been read 32 times!
